|
|
||||||||
Full Scientific Reports |
Correspondence: 1Corresponding Author: Jane Oakey, Tropical & Aquatic Health Laboratory, DPI&F, PO Box 1085, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia, e-mail: jane.oakey{at}dpi.qld.gov.au
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: PCR quality assurance RNA sample integrity
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the laboratory, it is often difficult to ascertain if RNA has been degraded in a sample, whether as a result of transport, storage, or the extraction process. Denaturing gel electrophoresis with Glyoxal or formaldehyde can be performed on an RNA extract if RNase-free electrophoresis equipment, reagents, and buffers are used. Electrophoresis will show if degradation has occurred, but it typically requires large amounts (approximately 10 µg) of RNA10 and hence is unsuitable for diagnostic purposes in which limited RNA may be obtained from specimens. In addition, RNA gels often indicate incomplete degradation, observed as a stained smear, and do not indicate if the degradation is sufficient to render the RNA unsuitable for reverse transcription and subsequent PCR amplification. Alternatively, many molecular amplification methods include a host-specific "housekeeping gene," test but these usually determine the integrity of the sample's DNA, such as a decapod 18S gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR),4 which will not be as susceptible to degradation as the RNA. To determine the integrity of RNA, test-specific and species-specific mRNA internal controls intended for standardization in quantitative PCR might be suitable for adaptation to internal controls for detection of intact RNA, such as porcine cytokine mRNA primers9 might be suited as an integrity control for detection of porcine viruses. In addition, other chromosomally derived RNA species such as 18S rRNA might be used as RNA control tests. The 18S rDNA sequence has been used by many researchers in phylogenetic studies but has been found to exhibit sufficient sequence variation that different primers are normally required for different species, groups, or closely related taxa. It has even been reported that 18S rRNA may be polymorphic within the same individual animal.2 Hence, the use of chromosomally derived templates such as mRNA or 18S rRNA would necessitate maintenance of primers and test parameters for each host species or closely related group likely to be tested in a laboratory. It would be notably simpler and more economical if a universal test could be used on multiple host species and tissues.
The method described here detects intact 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) transcribed in vivo from mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). A significant degree of sequence conservation of this gene across species has long been noted3 as mtDNA is inherited maternally only, to preserve the functionality of the RNA product. The aim of this study was to develop a method, based upon existing mtDNA amplification primers, which would detect the 16S rRNA products in animal tissue cells, irrespective of species, thus providing a universal quality assurance tool for tests based upon RNA analyses. This method will give the laboratory analyst the confidence that RNA degradation of a sample had not occurred to the extent that reverse transcription PCR-based diagnostic tests would be affected. This knowledge is important especially where transport and/or storage conditions may not have been optimal for the subsequent RNA analysis. The failure of rRNA amplification may demonstrate the unsuitability of a specimen and prevent the false interpretation of test data.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Determination of Pan-specific Primers
A number of reported 16S rDNA primers were compared for ability to transcribe 16S rRNA and amplify the synthesized cDNA. The primers tested were sourced from previous publications.6,8,11 Primers were compared in different combinations, where melting temperature and directional compatibilities were noted. Transcription and amplification reaction parameters initially were determined from the enzyme requirements, primer melting temperatures, and expected amplicon sizes and subsequently were optimized experimentally to give the parameters described below. These optimum conditions were used to test all samples listed in Table 1.
Reverse Transcription Pcr to Detect 16s Rrna
Total RNA (500 ng to 1 µg) extracted from tissues was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MuLV)-derived reverse transcriptasec primed with 16S-14726 (5'-AGATAGAAACCGACCTGG-3') according to the manufacturer's instructions. The resulting cDNA was stored at –20°C.
PCR mixtures were prepared from 1x polymerase buffer with ammonium salts,d 1.5 mmol l–1 magnesium chloride, 200 µmol l–1 each deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP), 5 pmol primer 16S-1472,6 5 pmol primer 16SL-3f11 (5'-AATTACTTTAGGGATAACAGCG-3'), 5 µg bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.5 U Taq polymerase,d 2.5 µl cDNA and sterile nuclease-free water to 25 µl. Reactions were cycled at 94°C/5 min; 40 x (94°C/30 sec; 42.5°C/30 sec; 72°C/45 sec); and 72°C/3 min. Amplicons of approximately 200 base pair (bp) were resolved by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining.
Comparison of Degradation Periods of Rrna and Viral Rna in Blood Samples
Fresh bovine blood from a single healthy animal (approximately 250 ml) was collected with lithium heparin anticoagulant. Aliquots of 900 µl were aseptically transferred to sterile 2-ml tubes.
Akabane virus was cultured in baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell monolayers in minimal essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. Aliquots of 100 µl cell culture supernatant containing Akabane virus were aseptically added to the blood samples and mixed by inverting the tubes. Twenty spiked blood samples were stored at each of the following temperatures: 37°C, 22–25°C (ambient temperature), 4°C, –20°C, and –80°C.
Akabane virus RNA was detected in the samples with reverse-transcription (RT) PCR using primers modified from those previously described.7 Primer sequences were AKAI206F-MOD 5'-CACAACCAAGTGTYG ATCTTA-3' and AKAI560R-MOD 5'-AAGTTGACATCCATYCCATC-3'. Highlighted bases had been modified to ensure primer compatibility with multiple Akabane data retrieved from Genbank (data not shown). Reverse transcription was conducted using AKAI206F-MOD and M-MuLVc according to the manufacturer's instructions. Amplification of target cDNA was conducted in 25 µl reactions containing 1x polymerase buffer,d 1.5 mmol l–1 magnesium chloride, 200 µmol l–1 each dNTP, 10 pmol each primer, 10 µg BSA, 1 U Taq polymerase,d 2.5 µl cDNA, and a volume balance of sterile nuclease-free water. Reactions were cycled at 94°C for 5 mins; 40x (94°C for 30 secs; 55°C for 30 secs; 72°C for 45 secs); 72°C for 5 mins and resolved using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining. Amplicons derived from Akabane virus RNA were approximately 350 bp.
Spiked blood samples were removed from storage temperatures at time intervals from 3 hrs to approximately 2 mos, or until negative results were obtained from 3 successive samples. Total RNA was extracted as described above and tested with the rRNA RT-PCR and the Akabane-specific RT-PCR simultaneously. Unspiked bovine blood was similarly tested as a negative control for the viral test and a positive control for the rRNA test, and cell culture supernatant was tested as a positive control for the viral test. Blood samples were discarded after each test, and new aliquots were used at each testing time period.
Comparison of Degradation Periods of Rrna in Different Tissues
Brain, spleen, and liver tissue were removed immediately from a freshly euthanized barramundi (Lates calcarifer). Each tissue was aseptically subdivided into approximately 50-mg aliquots in sterile 1.5-ml RNase-free plastic tubes. RNA was extracted from 1 sample of each tissue and tested with the rRNA RT-PCR, and remaining samples of each tissue were incubated at 37°C and 25°C. One tube of each tissue was removed from each temperature after 1, 2, 4, and 7 days and tested for RNA integrity using the rRNA RT-PCR.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reverse Transcription Pcr
While some primer combinations were observed to reverse transcribe and amplify only from some of the taxonomic groups tested, or amplified multiple products from some groups, cDNA primed with 16S-14726 followed by PCR using 16S-14726 and 16SL-3F11 consistently performed equally well in the PCR with all tissues and preservation methods tested (Table 1) and was used in subsequent analyses. This primer combination reverse transcribed and amplified a region of approximately 200 bp (Fig. 1).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To confirm that rRNA degradation also would imply degradation of viral RNA in vivo, replicate blood samples were spiked with cell culture supernatant containing Akabane virus. At timed intervals, samples from various storage temperatures were tested for both 16S rRNA and Akabane RNA. At the higher temperatures, where rRNA degradation was observed, the degradation of viral RNA occurred at a comparable rate. This demonstrated that in this model at least, the rRNA degradation represented degradation of viral RNA in vivo. Chilled temperatures are recommended over freezing for storage of blood fractions containing Arboviruses (http://www.oie.int/eng/normes/mmanual/A_summry.htm), so degradation was not expected to readily occur at these temperatures in the model used. Hence, it must not be assumed that the actual degradation times determined here are representative of RNA in other tissue-virus models, and these results must be observed only for comparative purposes between the 2 RNA degradation analyses. A blood-Akabane model was used here for convenience because it was possible to prepare the replicate homogeneous samples required for a timed trial, where time and temperature were the only variables, and because this laboratory has in place an RT-PCR, which has been shown to successfully detect part of the Akabane virus RNA. It may be expected that double-stranded RNA, for example from Orbiviruses, might be more resistant to degradation.
Other tissue specimens were shown to degrade more rapidly, presumably because of higher cell densities in solid tissue and subsequent amounts of endogenous RNases and proteases, which demonstrated that degradation rates of RNA vary according to the immediate environment. It must be noted that the tissues tested in this study were aseptically removed and subdivided immediately following euthanasia in the laboratory and were stored in constant temperature–controlled incubators. In the field, RNA in a tissue may be affected by environmental RNases, endogenous RNases from surrounding tissues, lack of asepsis, sample size, variable temperatures, variable humidity, and potential agitation through transport. Hence, the results presented in this study must serve only as a comparison of tissues, and not as a guide to sample "shelf-life."
The rRNA test described herein can be used in diagnostic laboratories to examine the integrity of RNA in tissue samples, which is particularly useful for quality assurance when the transport and/or storage conditions have deviated from optimal conditions, or where suitability of the template RNA may be otherwise questioned or doubted. The ability to use a standard protocol for multiple animal types is more convenient and economical than maintaining reagents for multiple different tests. The cDNA synthesis can be carried out simultaneously with other reverse transcriptions as conditions are standard for this reaction. The PCR step can be carried out simultaneously with other reactions if a gradient block thermal cycler is used, where more than 1 primer annealing temperature can be performed at any one time, and if the primer annealing and extension durations are similar. Depending upon the reaction conditions of the specific target PCR, the tests theoretically may be suited to multiplexing, but this would require separate validation in the specific test models and was not attempted here.
The results demonstrate also that the 16S primers prime amplification from the host's mtDNA, which emphasizes the requirement to eliminate DNA from the reverse transcription template. Failure to do so may result in contaminating host DNA carry-through to the PCR reaction and give false-positive results. A DNA-free extract can be confirmed as such by performing the 16S PCR step alone on an extract, where amplification will indicate the presence of rDNA.
However, because the 16S rDNA region can be amplified directly by the same primers, the primers may be used also to determine DNA template integrity for direct PCR tests such as detection of DNA virus or bacterial genes in animal tissues, without the reverse transcription step needed for RNA templates. In the event that an animal tissue requires detection of both RNA and DNA templates, the total nucleic acid extraction will need a subsample to be treated with DNase prior to testing for RNA integrity.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Sources and manufacturers |
|---|
|
|
|---|
a. RNAlater; Qiagen, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia. ![]()
b. Wizard SV Total RNA Isolation System; Promega, Annandale, New South Wales, Australia. ![]()
c. RevertAid; MBI Fermentas, Quantum Scientific, Murarrie, Queensland, Australia. ![]()
d. Taq Polymerase (recombinant); Quantum Scientific, Murarrie, Queensland, Australia. ![]()
e. 100 bp DNA ladder, GeneRuler; MBI Fermentas, Quantum Scientific, Murarrie, Queensland, Australia. ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |