JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delgado, S
Right arrow Articles by Carmenes, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Delgado, S
Right arrow Articles by Carmenes, P
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 7, Issue 2, 206-209
Copyright © 1995 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of sheep infected and vaccinated with Brucella melitensis

S Delgado, M Fernandez, and P Carmenes

Departamento de Sanidad Animal (Enfermedades Infecciosas y Epidemiologia), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Leon, Spain.

An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), using the lipopolysaccharide of the cell wall as an antigen, was used to detect Brucella melitensis antibodies in ovine serum. The test was carried out on 703 samples of field serums, which were also analyzed by the complement fixation (CF) test and the rose Bengal (RB) test. The ELISA results were more similar to those of the CF test (kappa = 0.89) than to the results of the RB test (kappa = 0.73). The ELISA also had high sensitivity (94.7%) and a somewhat lower specificity (90.4%). One group of 139 young brucellosis-free animals 3-6 months of age were vaccinated with B. melitensis rev. 1 at a dose of 1.2 x 10(9) live organisms. The ELISA detected a significantly lower number of reactors than the CF and RB tests (P < 0.001). The ELISA values remained below the cutoff level during the 9 months following vaccination.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.