JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baetz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wesley, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baetz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wesley, I.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 7, Issue 1, 82-86
Copyright © 1995 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Detection of anti-listeriolysin O in dairy cattle experimentally infected with Listeria monocytogenes

AL Baetz and IV Wesley

Physiopathology Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Ames, IA 50010, USA.

A dot-blot assay and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect listeriosis in dairy cattle were developed that detected anti-listeriolysin O antibodies in the serum of cows experimentally infected with Listeria monocytogenes. The tests utilized purified listeriolysin O (LLO) as the detection antigen and streptolysin O (SLO) to absorb cross-reacting antibodies. The two tests were compared with an agglutination test that used formalin-killed whole L. monocytogenes cells. Blood samples were collected periodically from 17 cows after intramammary gland infection, and the development of anti-LLO antibodies was followed by an agglutination test, the dot-blot test, and the ELISA. In general, an agglutination titer of > 640 was needed for a positive dot-blot anti-LLO test for nonpregnant cows. However, 1 pregnant cow with an agglutination titer of 20 was positive in the dot-blot test. The ELISA was as sensitive as the dot-blot assay but gave a quantitative measurement to distinguish serum samples of positive reactors from cross-reactors. The specificity of the LLO-based tests was further evaluated using serum from cows that had been experimentally infected with Staphylococcus aureus, 17 of which had agglutination titers for L. monocytogenes > 640. These elevated agglutination titers were probably due to cross-reacting bacterial antigens because serum from 9 of 17 of these animals did not react to the purified LLO antigen. A positive response to the LLO-based dot-blot and ELISA assays is indicative of previous or current infection with L. monocytogenes.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.