JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Theon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Griffey, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Theon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Griffey, S
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 6, Issue 4, 453-457
Copyright © 1994 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

In situ analysis of cellular proliferation in canine, feline and equine tumors by immunohistochemistry: a comparison of bromodeoxyuridine, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and interchromatin-associated antigen immunostaining techniques

AP Theon, L Metzger, and S Griffey

Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616.

Cell proliferation in canine, feline, and equine tumors was evaluated using immunohistochemical detection of in vitro 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and interchromatin-associated antigen (p105). Ten tumors in each species were analyzed. The tumor proliferative fraction (PF) was defined as the percentage of labeled nuclei for 5,000 tumor nuclei counted. Immunoreactivity was observed with all techniques in all species. A good correlation was observed between the proliferative fractions measured with the BrdU (PFBrdU) and PCNA (PFPCNA) techniques (rs = 0.523, P = 0.0026). There was no correlation between the PFs measured with the BrdU (PFBrdU) and p105 (PFP105) techniques. Using the median values obtained from the different approaches as cutoff points to define slowly and rapidly proliferating tumors, there was an 80% agreement (P = 0.009) between PFBrdU and PFPCNA and no agreement between PFBrdU and PFP105. The results of this study indicate that both BrdU and PCNA labeling methods can be used reliably for identifying proliferating cells in animal tumors. In addition, PCNA could be used to replace the BrdU method to assess tumor proliferative fraction because it does not require pretreatment of tissues.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
H. Ueno, P. Kanellakis, A. Agrotis, and A. Bobik
Blood Flow Regulates the Development of Vascular Hypertrophy, Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation, and Endothelial Cell Nitric Oxide Synthase in Hypertension
Hypertension, July 1, 2000; 36(1): 89 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.