JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Struble, A.
Right arrow Articles by Silva, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Struble, A.
Right arrow Articles by Silva, J, Jr
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 6, Issue 3, 342-347
Copyright © 1994 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Fecal shedding of Clostridium difficile in dogs: a period prevalence survey in a veterinary medical teaching hospital

AL Struble, YJ Tang, PH Kass, PH Gumerlock, BR Madewell, and J Silva Jr

Department of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616.

The goal of this study was to determine the fecal prevalence of Clostridium difficile in dogs who were patients at a veterinary medical teaching hospital. Stool specimens collected from 152 dogs (in- and outpatients) were analyzed for the presence of C. difficile. An additional 42 stool specimens were collected and examined from dogs recently housed at local animal shelters. Following culture on selective medium, C. difficile was identified by a latex agglutination test, and the presence of the toxin A and B genes was determined individually by polymerase chain reaction. Clostridium difficile was isolated from the feces of 28 of the veterinary hospital patients (18.4%); isolates from 14 of these patients (50.0%) were toxigenic. Diarrhea was a clinical finding in 5 (35.7%) of the dogs carrying toxigenic isolates of C. difficile, whereas diarrhea was noted in only 2 of 14 dogs (14.3%) shedding nontoxigenic isolates. Three of 14 dogs (21.4%) shedding toxigenic isolates of C. difficile were receiving antibiotics at the time of stool collection, whereas 5 of 14 dogs (37.5%) shedding nontoxigenic strains of C. difficile were receiving antibiotics. The carriage rate of C. difficile was significantly higher for animals categorized as inpatients of the veterinary hospital. The carriage rate also provided evidence for an increased risk for fecal shedding with increasing age. Clostridium difficile was not isolated from any of the 42 dogs recently housed at local animal shelters. This study confirms the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in dogs at a veterinary teaching hospital.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
M. K. Keel and J. G. Songer
The Comparative Pathology of Clostridium difficile-associated Disease
Vet. Pathol., May 1, 2006; 43(3): 225 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
S. Mentula, J. Harmoinen, M. Heikkila, E. Westermarck, M. Rautio, P. Huovinen, and E. Kononen
Comparison between Cultured Small-Intestinal and Fecal Microbiotas in Beagle Dogs
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 2005; 71(8): 4169 - 4175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
L. G Arroyo, S. A Kruth, B. M Willey, H. R Staempfli, D. E Low, and J S. Weese
PCR ribotyping of Clostridium difficile isolates originating from human and animal sources
J. Med. Microbiol., February 1, 2005; 54(2): 163 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.