JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenlee, M.
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenlee, M.
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, J.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 6, Issue 2, 182-187
Copyright © 1994 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Comparison of particle concentration fluorescence immunoassay to card and complement fixation tests using isolation of Brucella abortus as the standard

MT Greenlee, JA Farrar, DW Hird, and JC Holmes

US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Arlington, TX 76010.

Serologic test data and bacteriologic culture results from 816 cattle were evaluated. Brucella abortus (field strain or strain 19) was isolated from 27.3% of the cows. Results of the card test, particle concentration fluorescence immunoassay (PCFIA), and complement fixation (CF) test were compared. Antibody titers were directly associated with B. abortus isolation, with the majority (64.7%) of field strain isolations having a PCFIA value of < or = 0.300 and a CF test result of at least 1+ at a 1:160 dilution. The specificity of the CF test was significantly higher than that of the PCFIA (at CF > or = 1:40 and PCFIA < or = 0.300).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.