JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oren, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oren, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, J
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 5, Issue 4, 529-533
Copyright © 1993 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Evaluation of serological pseudorabies tests for the detection of antibodies during early infection

SL Oren, SL Swenson, DR Kinker, HT Hill, HL Hu, and J Zimmerman

Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames 50011.

Six enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, a latex agglutination test, and the standard microtitration serum virus neutralization test were compared for their ability to detect antibodies against pseudorabies virus (PRV) during the early stages of infection. Thirty-five pigs were infected intranasally with 10(5)-10(7) TCID50 of either the Iowa 4892 pneumotropic or the Becker strain of PRV. Blood samples were drawn from experimentally inoculated animals on days 4-10, 14, and 21 postchallenge. Test sensitivity estimates and comparisons among tests were made for each sampling day over the 21-day monitoring period. Results of this study demonstrated differences among tests in 1) the time from inoculation to initial antibody detection, 2) the time to detect > or = 95% of the infected pigs, and 3) the time from initial antibody detection to determination of > or = 95% as positive. By day 10 postchallenge, no statistically significant difference in diagnostic sensitivity was observed among the 8 tests compared in the study.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.