JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B.
Right arrow Articles by Simonson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B.
Right arrow Articles by Simonson, R.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 5, Issue 4, 510-515
Copyright © 1993 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

ELISA method for detection of influenza A infection in swine

BW Lee, RF Bey, MJ Baarsch, and RR Simonson

Department of Veterinary PathoBiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108.

An antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed to monitor virus shedding associated with experimental infection with a field strain of swine influenza in pigs. The assay consisted of a monoclonal anti-nucleoprotein capture antibody and a biotinylated rabbit anti-influenza A (H1N1) sandwich antibody. The antigen-capture system was capable of detecting as little as 1 ng/ml purified virus. The ELISA system surpassed egg cultivation procedures in the detection of low levels of shedding virus. Egg cultivation procedures indicated that most viral shedding had ceased by day 10 postinfection. In contrast, antigen-capture ELISA still showed an ongoing presence of viral antigen. A virus-capture ELISA, using this capture-sandwich antibody system, is equivalent in sensitivity to conventional egg inoculation procedures for the detection of the early phases of virus shedding. The automative potential of an ELISA-based system coupled with a substantially reduced assay time requirement give this virus-capture ELISA a distinct advantage over other cell culture or egg-based diagnostic techniques.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvdiHome page
B. Leuwerke, P. Kitikoon, R. Evans, and E. Thacker
Comparison of three serological assays to determine the cross-reactivity of antibodies from eight genetically diverse U.S. Swine influenza viruses
J Vet Diagn Invest, July 1, 2008; 20(4): 426 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.