JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pursell, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pursell, A.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 3, Issue 1, 66-71
Copyright © 1991 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Comparison of a veterinary breakpoint minimal inhibitory concentration system and a standardized disk agar diffusion procedure for antimicrobic susceptibility testing

CK Watson, JR Cole Jr, and AR Pursell

Veterinary Diagnostic and Investigational Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Tifton 31794.

The correlation between the antimicrobic standard disk agar diffusion procedure and a veterinary antimicrobic breakpoint minimal inhibitory concentration system was evaluated. Bacterial isolates representing 5 different genera were tested against 15 antimicrobics. There were 3,795 tests performed; 77.3% of the test results were in agreement, 22.6% were in disagreement. Thirty-one percent of the conflicting results were due to the organism being intermediate on the standard disk agar diffusion procedure. Results suggest that the breakpoint system needs more than 1 antimicrobic dilution per antimicrobic, or a change in some of the single dilutions in the breakpoint system would eliminate some of these discrepancies. Another possibility would be to utilize more than 1 panel design, i.e., 1 for gram-positive organisms, 1 for gram-negative organisms, and 1 for fastidious organisms.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.