JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation Vol. 20 Issue 1, 60-63
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Raidal, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Raidal, S.

Brief Communications

Elimination of false-positive polymerase chain reaction results resulting from hole punch carryover contamination

Nicolai Bonne1, Phillip Clark, Patrick Shearer and Shane Raidal

Correspondence: 1Corresponding Author: Murdoch University, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150. nicolai{at}bonne.no

The collection of biological material (e.g., blood) directly onto filter paper for subsequent use in laboratory assays such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), has become a common practice. Dried cells or fluid on the paper can be readily rehydrated and retrieved into a standard volume of an appropriate elution buffer but introduces a dilution factor to the sample. The use of a common cutting instrument for excising a standard-sized piece of paper that contains the material also introduces the potential for transferring biological material from one sample to subsequent samples, causing false-positive results by PCR. In the present study, filter-paper–collected blood that contained beak and feather disease virus was used to determine if viral DNA could be transferred between samples by a hole punch used to excise sequential filter papers. It was determined that false-positive results could be obtained at least 13 times after a positive sample. Subsequently, the efficacy of 4 methods of hole punch disinfection, flaming, VirkonS, bleach, and a bleach-ethanol combination, was assessed. The only effective and practical method to destroy DNA was a method where the hole punch was agitated in commercial bleach, rinsed in water, the water was displaced with 100% ethanol and air-dried. This method was simple, cheap, and relatively rapid, and allowed for the use of a single hole punch for a series of samples, without carryover contamination and consequent false-positive results.

Key Words: Beak and feather disease virus • contamination • disinfection • filter paper • hypochlorite • polymerase chain reaction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
N. Bonne, P. Shearer, M. Sharp, P. Clark, and S. Raidal
Assessment of recombinant beak and feather disease virus capsid protein as a vaccine for psittacine beak and feather disease
J. Gen. Virol., March 1, 2009; 90(3): 640 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.