|
|
||||||||
Brief Communications |
Correspondence: 1Corresponding Author: Murdoch University, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150. nicolai{at}bonne.no
The collection of biological material (e.g., blood) directly onto filter paper for subsequent use in laboratory assays such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), has become a common practice. Dried cells or fluid on the paper can be readily rehydrated and retrieved into a standard volume of an appropriate elution buffer but introduces a dilution factor to the sample. The use of a common cutting instrument for excising a standard-sized piece of paper that contains the material also introduces the potential for transferring biological material from one sample to subsequent samples, causing false-positive results by PCR. In the present study, filter-paper–collected blood that contained beak and feather disease virus was used to determine if viral DNA could be transferred between samples by a hole punch used to excise sequential filter papers. It was determined that false-positive results could be obtained at least 13 times after a positive sample. Subsequently, the efficacy of 4 methods of hole punch disinfection, flaming, VirkonS, bleach, and a bleach-ethanol combination, was assessed. The only effective and practical method to destroy DNA was a method where the hole punch was agitated in commercial bleach, rinsed in water, the water was displaced with 100% ethanol and air-dried. This method was simple, cheap, and relatively rapid, and allowed for the use of a single hole punch for a series of samples, without carryover contamination and consequent false-positive results.
Key Words: Beak and feather disease virus contamination disinfection filter paper hypochlorite polymerase chain reaction
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Bonne, P. Shearer, M. Sharp, P. Clark, and S. Raidal Assessment of recombinant beak and feather disease virus capsid protein as a vaccine for psittacine beak and feather disease J. Gen. Virol., March 1, 2009; 90(3): 640 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |