HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rovira, A. Articles by Muñoz-Zanzi, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rovira, A. Articles by Muñoz-Zanzi, C.

Evaluation of the sensitivity of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction to detect porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on individual and pooled samples from boars

Correspondence: ¹Corresponding Author: Albert Rovira, 385 An Sci/Vet Med, 1988 Fitch Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55108, e-mail: rove0010{at}umn.edu

Boar studs are continuously monitored for the presence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) by testing different biological samples by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In most cases, samples are run in pools, even though the impact of pooling on the sensitivity of RT-PCR is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using PCR on pooled samples through the estimation of the sensitivity of RT-PCR on different biological samples run individually, in pools of 3 and in pools of 5. Twenty-nine boars were inoculated with a low virulent PRRSV isolate. Serum, blood swab, and semen samples were obtained from each boar every 2 to 3 days for 2 weeks. Each sample was tested by RT-PCR undiluted or diluted 1:3 and 1:5 with negative samples. Eleven of the 29 boars did not appear to get infected from the inoculum, as evidenced by no seroconversion 15 days after inoculation. Data from the other 18 boars showed that serum was the best sample to detect PRRSV during acute infection, with the blood swab sample performing almost as well. Semen samples failed to detect PRRSV infection in most of the cases. Pooling samples at pool sizes of 3 and 5 resulted in a decrease in the sensitivity of RT-PCR. Sensitivity was reduced by 6% and 8%, respectively, when serum or blood swab samples were run in pools of 5. The impact of pooling on the sensitivity of PCR was higher in samples taken during the beginning of the viremic period.

Key Words: Blood swab • boar • PCR • pooling • PRRS virus • semen • sensitivity • serum

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Rovira, J. Abrahante, M. Murtaugh, and C. Munoz-Zanzi Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the detection of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus J Vet Diagn Invest, May 1, 2009; 21(3): 350 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Madson, S. Ramamoorthy, C. Kuster, N. Pal, X.-J. Meng, P. G. Halbur, and T. Opriessnig Characterization of shedding patterns of Porcine circovirus types 2a and 2b in experimentally inoculated mature boars J Vet Diagn Invest, November 1, 2008; 20(6): 725 - 734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]