JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Panarese, S
Right arrow Articles by Sarli, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Panarese, S
Right arrow Articles by Sarli, G
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 18, Issue 4, 362-368
Copyright © 2006 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Evaluation of telomerase in canine mammary tissues by immunohistochemical analysis and a polymerase chain reaction-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

S Panarese, B Brunetti, and G Sarli

Department of Veterinary Public Health and Animal Pathology, Section of General Pathology and Pathologic Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bologna Via Tolara di Sopra, 50-40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna, Italy.

The enzyme telomerase is considered a potential marker for neoplastic tissue and is used as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in clinical medicine and therapeutics. For this reason, the possible role of telomerase activation in the process of malignant transformation is currently the subject of intense research efforts. The focus of the study reported here was to detect telomerase in 37 canine mammary samples, by comparing two methods: immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis for detecting the catalytic subunit of the enzyme, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), and the telomeric repeat amplification protocol-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TRAP-ELISA), a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based technique that uses a colorimetric detection method. Using the TRAP-ELISA, samples were considered positive when they yielded a difference of at least 0.2 absorbance units between the readings at 450 nm versus 690 nm wavelength. On the basis of this criterion, 18 negative and 19 positive cases were obtained. Specific immunohistochemical staining was observed mainly in the nucleoli, to a lesser extent in the nuclei, and rarely in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells. A sample was considered positive when at least 10% of the epithelial cells had specific staining. The Pearson correlation between the TRAP-ELISA and IHC results was significant only when IHC nucleolar (r = 0.53, P < 0.01) or nuclear (r = 0.36, P < 0.05) staining or their combination (r = 0.58, P < 0.01) was considered. Thus, IHC staining of nucleoli and nuclei can be considered as an alternative method to the TRAP-ELISA. The detection of telomerase in normal mammary gland and fibrocystic mastopathy using both methods does not support the idea that telomerase may be used as a specific marker of mammary neoplasia in dogs.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.