JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Northrup, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gieger, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Northrup, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gieger, T.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 17, Issue 6, 561-564
Copyright © 2005 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Variation among pathologists in the histologic grading of canine cutaneous mast cell tumors with uniform use of a single grading reference

NC Northrup, EW Howerth, BG Harmon, CA Brown, KP Carmicheal, AP Garcia, KS Latimer, JS Munday, PM Rakich, LJ Richey, NL Stedman, and TL Gieger

Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Comparative Oncology Program, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens 30602, USA.

Ten veterinary pathologists independently assigned histologic grades to the same 60 canine cutaneous mast cell tumors using the Patnaik classifications. The degree of agreement in grading among the pathologists was compared with the degree of agreement among the same pathologists in a previous study, in which each pathologist used the reference for grading that he/she uses routinely. Mean agreement improved significantly from 50.3% to 62.1% with uniform use of the Patnaik classifications (P = 0.00001), suggesting that there is value in uniform application of a single grading scheme for canine cutaneous mast cell tumors. Agreement among pathologists was still not 100%, suggesting that a more objective grading scheme should be developed and that other histologic indicators of prognosis should be investigated.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
jvdiHome page
B. K. Wobeser, B. A. Kidney, B. E. Powers, S. J. Withrow, M. N. Mayer, M. T. Spinato, and A. L. Allen
Agreement among surgical pathologists evaluating routine histologic sections of digits amputated from cats and dogs
J Vet Diagn Invest, July 1, 2007; 19(4): 439 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
J. D. Webster, V. Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, R. A. Miller, J. B. Kaneene, and M. Kiupel
Cellular Proliferation in Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors: Associations with c-KIT and Its Role in Prognostication
Vet. Pathol., May 1, 2007; 44(3): 298 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.