JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Foley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Foley, J.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 16, Issue 4, 347-351
Copyright © 2004 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Evaluation Studies

A comparison of routine culture with polymerase chain reaction technology for the detection of Mycoplasma species in feline nasal samples

LR Johnson, NL Drazenovich, and JE Foley

Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Nasal flush samples were collected from 20 cats and submitted for Mycoplasma culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Nasal biopsy samples were also obtained from each cat and simultaneously evaluated for Mycoplasma by standard culture and PCR. Concordance of the test results was determined through calculation of the kappa statistic. In 6 cats, nasal flush samples were culture positive for Mycoplasma. PCR was positive in each culture-positive cat and also positive in 1 flush sample that was culture negative. DNA sequencing of the PCR product from the culture negative flush sample identified the organism as Mycoplasma arginini. All other flush samples that were culture negative were also PCR negative (kappa = 0.89). Nasal biopsy samples from 7 cats were culture positive for Mycoplasma, and all were PCR positive. Biopsy samples that were culture negative for Mycoplasma were also PCR negative (kappa = 1.0). Results of culture and PCR for both nasal flush and biopsy were concordant in 19 of 20 cats, and PCR was able to identify an unusual Mycoplasma species that did not grow in culture. In most cats, organisms could be detected in either nasal flush or biopsy samples. In this study, PCR provided rapid and sensitive detection of Mycoplasma species in nasal samples from cats and detected 1 organism that did not grow in culture.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
L. D. Gray, K. L. Ketring, and Y.-W. Tang
Clinical Use of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing To Identify Mycoplasma felis and M. gateae Associated with Feline Ulcerative Keratitis
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2005; 43(7): 3431 - 3434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.