JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, S
Right arrow Articles by Gajadhar, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parker, S
Right arrow Articles by Gajadhar, A
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 15, Issue 5, 460-465
Copyright © 2003 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of a commercially available culture kit and a diagnostic culture test using Diamond's media for diagnosing Tritrichomonas foetus in bulls

S Parker, J Campbell, and A Gajadhar

Centre for Animal Parasitology, Saskatoon Laboratory, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 2R3, Canada.

A number of different culture media have been described for use in the diagnosis of Tritrichomonas foetus infection in bulls, and recently, a commercial culture kit has become available. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of 2 culture-based diagnostic tests for T. foetus in bulls. One test used a commercial kit for transport and culture of the samples. The other test used a thioglycollate transport medium (TFTM) for transport and a modified Diamond's medium (MDM) for culture of the samples. Twenty-one bulls infected with T. foetus were sampled repeatedly. On each sampling day, samples collected from the left and right sides of the bull were tested with one of the 2 diagnostic tests being compared. The effect of the type of diagnostic test on the outcome of the test was evaluated with a chi-square test for the calculated odds ratio. Because repeated tests from the same bull cannot be considered independent measures, unadjusted chi-square tests were adjusted for the effect of clustering by bull. Samples tested using the commercial kit were 6.95 times as likely to be positive as samples tested with a diagnostic test using MDM (P < 0.001).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.