JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, P
Right arrow Articles by Tripathy, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, P
Right arrow Articles by Tripathy, D.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 15, Issue 1, 50-54
Copyright © 2003 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Identification and characterization of fowlpox virus strains using monoclonal antibodies

P Singh, TJ Kim, and DN Tripathy

Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61802, USA.

The use of 2 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), P1D9 and P2D4, which recognize different fowlpox virus (FPV) antigens, for the identification and characterization of FPV strains was evaluated. Initially, the MAbs were used in conjunction with a dot blot assay that enabled FPV to be differentiated from the avian herpesvirus, infectious laryngotracheitis virus. Confirmation of the specificity of these MAbs was provided by the demonstration that only FPV antigens were recognized by a combination of both antibodies when used for immunoblotting proteins contained in various avipoxviruses. Later, an antigenic characterization of 11 FPV field isolates, 6 FPV vaccine strains, and 3 pigeonpox virus vaccines was performed by Western blotting with the individual MAbs. Whereas MAb P2D4 consistently recognized a protein with an apparent molecular weight of 60 kD, there was variability in the size of the antigen that was immunoreactive with the other MAb. For example, MAb P1D9 recognized an antigen of apparent molecular weight of 46 kD in all vaccine strains except 2 of FPV origin. In these exceptions, either only a 39-kD or both a 42- and 46-kD protein were immunoreactive. As for the field isolates, a 39-kD antigen was recognized in 8 of them, whereas a 42-kD antigen was detected in the remaining 3. Therefore, the more extensive immunoblotting technique may facilitate FPV strain differentiation, whereas routine diagnosis of fowlpox could be accomplished by using the MAb-based dot blot assay.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.