|
|
||||||||
Articles |
Department of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Minimum inhibition concentrations (MICs) were determined for ampicillin, ceftiofur, cephalothin, chloramphenicol, enrofloxacin, gentamicin, lincomycin, lincospectin (lincomycin/spectinomycin), neomycin, premafloxacin, spectinomycin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and tetracycline against a total of 180 isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella choleraesuis (60 each) clinically isolated from pigs on farms in Taiwan from 1994 to 1996. No more than 3 isolates per farm were used. Ceftiofur had the highest activity in vitro against isolates of A. pleuropneumoniae, E. coli, and S. choleraesuis, with MIC90 values of 0.03, 2, and 1 microg/ml, respectively. Premafloxacin was highly active against isolates of A. pleuropneumoniae, E. coli, and S. choleraesuis, with MIC90 values of 2, 8, and 0.5 microg/ml, respectively, which were lower than those with enrofloxacin (MIC90 8, 32, and 2 microg/ml, respectively). Neomycin was moderately active against A. pleuropneumoniae and E. coli, with MIC90 values of 8 and 64 microg/ml, respectively, but was inactive with S. choleraesuis. Gentamicin showed high activity against A. pleuropneumoniae (MIC90 of 2 microg/ml) but was only moderately active with E. coli and S. choleraesuis (MIC90 of 64 and 32 microg/ml). Cephalothin was highly active against isolates of A. pleuropneumoniae (MIC90 of 1 microg/ml) but was inactive with E. coli (MIC90 of 128 microg/ml). Lincomycin had moderate activity (MIC90 of 32 microg/ml) against A. pleuropneumoniae. Chloramphenicol, lincomycin, and tetracycline were inactive with E. coli and S. choleraesuis (MIC90 > 128 microg/ml). In conclusion, ceftiofur and premafloxacin were highly active against isolates of A. pleuropneumoniae, E. coli, and S. choleraesuis, enrofloxacin and gentamicin were highly to moderately active; cephalothin was highly active against A. pleuropneumoniae and moderately active against S. cholearesuis; chloramphenicol, lincomycin, and tetracycline were active only with A. pleuropneumoniae; neomycin was moderately active against A. pleuropneumoniae and E. coli. The other antimicrobials tested were inactive.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M Sjolund, A. J. M. de la Fuente, C. Fossum, and P. Wallgren Responses of pigs to a re-challenge with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae after being treated with different antimicrobials following their initial exposure Vet Rec., May 2, 2009; 164(18): 550 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Khanna, L. Waechter, J. Sargeant, W. F. Clark, and A. X. Garg Environmental prevention of human disease from verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1819 - 1822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-C. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, C.-F. Chang, K.-S. Yeh, C.-H. Chiu, C. Chu, M.-S. Chien, Y.-M. Hsu, L.-S. Tsai, and C.-S. Chiou Epidemiologic Relationship between Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Choleraesuis Strains Isolated from Humans and Pigs in Taiwan (1997 to 2002) J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2005; 43(6): 2798 - 2804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Chiu, L.-H. Su, and C. Chu Salmonella enterica Serotype Choleraesuis: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinical Disease, and Treatment Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2004; 17(2): 311 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |