JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, L.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 13, Issue 5, 394-398
Copyright © 2001 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Evaluation Studies

The use of polymerase chain reaction assay to diagnose proliferative gill disease in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus)

JW Whitaker, LM Pote, L Khoo, R Shivaji, and LA Hanson

College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State 39762, USA.

To assess the potential of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay as a diagnostic tool in the detection of proliferative gill disease (PGD) in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), PCR assays were compared with the traditional diagnostic methods of gill wet mounts and histology. A PCR assay using primers for Aurantiactinomyxon ictaluri, the actinospore associated with PGD, was performed with tissues from fish from commercial ponds. Using histology as the "gold standard," the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the PCR assay were all >90%. In comparison, the wet mount examinations had a lower sensitivity and specificity. Using the chi-square test and a test for strength of association, there was a significant, strong association between results obtained by PCR and those obtained by the other 2 methods. These results demonstrate that the PCR assay is a good diagnostic tool for the detection of PGD.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.