JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peharpre, D
Right arrow Articles by Aubert, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peharpre, D
Right arrow Articles by Aubert, M
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 11, Issue 4, 330-333
Copyright © 1999 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Comparison of visual microscopic and computer-automated fluorescence detection of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies

D Peharpre, F Cliquet, E Sagne, C Renders, F Costy, and M Aubert

Institut Pasteur de Bruxelles, Service de la Rage, Belgium.

The rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) and the fluorescent antibody virus neutralization test (FAVNT) are both diagnostic tests for determining levels of rabies neutralizing antibodies. An automated method for determining fluorescence has been implemented to reduce the work time required for fluorescent visual microscopic observations. The automated method offers several advantages over conventional visual observation, such as the ability to rapidly test many samples. The antibody titers obtained with automated techniques were similar to those obtained with both the RFFIT (n = 165, r = 0.93, P < 0.001) and the FAVNT (n = 52, r = 0.99, P < 0.001).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.