JVDI Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ewalt, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ewalt, D.
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 1, Issue 3, 227-230
Copyright © 1989 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Comparison of three culture techniques for the isolation of Brucella abortus from bovine supramammary lymph nodes

DR Ewalt

United States Department of Agriculture, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Ames, IA 50010.

Three different culturing techniques were compared and evaluated to determine the most effective method for isolating Brucella abortus from bovine supramammary lymph nodes (SM's). In method I, the SM was sliced in half, and the inner surface was minced finely with a sterile scalpel. The minced surface was spread onto the agar surface of 4 selective media. In method II, the SM was cut into small pieces and placed in a bag with a volume of phosphate-buffered saline equal to the volume of the lymph node. The bag was placed in a laboratory blender and the SM was macerated for 5 min. The tissue suspension was spread with a sterile cotton swab onto the agar surface of 4 selective media. In method III, the SM was processed in the laboratory blender. One milliliter of the suspension was pipetted into a flask of biphasic medium, and 2 ml of the suspension was pipetted into another flask of biphasic medium. A total of 626 SM's from 285 cows were cultured. Brucella abortus was isolated from 149 (52.3%) cows by 1 or more methods. Brucella abortus was isolated from 136 cows by method I. 137 cows by method II, and 86 cows by method III. Nine (3.2%) cows were positive by method I only, 11 (3.9%) cows by method II only, and 2 (0.7%) cows by method III only. The isolation rate for method III was significantly lower than for method I or II. There was no significant difference between methods I and II.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Veterinary PathologyHome page
T. Gidlewski, N. F. Cheville, J. C. Rhyan, L. D. Miller, and M. J. Gilsdorf
Experimental Brucella abortus Induced Abortion in a Llama: Pathologic Effects
Veterinary Pathology, January 1, 2000; 37(1): 77 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.