JVDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G.
Right arrow Articles by Carman, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G.
Right arrow Articles by Carman, J
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, Vol 1, Issue 1, 39-44
Copyright © 1989 by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians


Articles

Use of an immunoperoxidase test for the detection of bovine herpesvirus-1 in aborted fetal tissue

GH Smith, JK Collins, and J Carman

Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523.

An indirect immunoperoxidase (IP) procedure using a specific monoclonal antibody and an avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex was developed and applied to detect virus antigen in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. This IP procedure was compared with currently used diagnostic tests for detection of virus-induced abortions caused by bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1). The IP procedure was applied to detect BHV-1 antigen in sections of liver and lung from 87 aborted fetuses. Sixteen of these cases were positive for viral antigen by IP staining. Sections from both liver and lung were positive in 15 of the 16 cases. A fluorescent antibody test (FA), which was applied to acetone-fixed frozen sections of liver and lung, gave positive results on 12 of the 87 fetuses, 11 of which were also positive by IP. Seven of the 12 FA-positive cases were positive on both sections of liver and lung. When FA and IP were compared. FA had a sensitivity of 67% and IP had a sensitivity of 94%. Virus was isolated from one of the 67 cases tested. The tissues in which antigen was most frequently detected by IP were liver, lung, and kidney. Distinct multifocal staining was seen in positive sections of all these tissues.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.